The first in a, most likely, annoyingly sporadic series about the portrayal of Detroit in literature and other published works.
So, given the dearth of Detroit literary novels, you'd think it would be a welcome development when Roberto Bolaño, a Chilean writer seemingly destine for a Nobel Prize had he not passed away so unjustly at the age of 50, chose to use Detroit as a setting in his near-universally acclaimed final novel 2666. Unfortunately it is not a welcome development, but a peculiar, cringe-inducing episode.
The Detroit part of this 900-page book is only 22 pages long, and comes as a surprise after Bolaño has deftly taken the reader through several parts of Europe. I don't know for certain that Bolaño never came to Detroit, but based on his brief description of the city it seems quite evident he did not. And yes, this is quibbling, and no, it doesn't really affect anything in the large scheme of things, but it just would have been nice if there were a greater amount of verisimilitude.
In the novel, a reporter for a New York-based magazine called Black Dawn, Oscar Fate, is sent to Detroit to interview one of the founders of the Black Panthers, a man named Barry Seaman. Seaman's neighborhood is described as follows: "The neighborhood looked like a neighborhood of Ford and General Motors retirees. As he walked he looked at the buildings, five and six stories high, and all he saw were old people sitting on the stoops or leaning out the windows smoking." Later, when Seaman is giving a speech in a church, he describes California for the benefit of his Detroit audience like this: "People live in houses not apartment buildings, he said, and then he embarked on a comparison of houses (one-story, at most two-story), and four- or five-story buildings where the elevator is broken one day and out of order the next."
The problem here, of course, is that Detroit is primarily a city of houses and not apartment buildings; and one of the fundamental aspects of the city is that autoworkers, not just those from Ford and GM but also those who worked for Chrysler, were able to buy their own homes. Neighborhoods full of apartment buildings, the way Bolaño describes them, don't really exist in Detroit.
Bolaño's writing often fluctuates between the real and the imagined, between the conscious and unconscious, he plays a lot with our sense of reality, and it is often his intent to keep the reader guessing it seems. But the Detroit part of 2666 is confusing for its odd attempts at exactness, like when he calls it the "Detroit-Wayne County airport" which isn't what anyone calls it, or when the Oscar Fate character "...headed down Woodward Avenue and checked out the downtown. He had a cup of coffee and toast for breakfast at a Greektown diner." And that's it, that's as descriptive as Bolaño gets when it comes to downtown, as though his information was gleaned from an in-flight magazine.
The book moves from Detroit to Mexico, to the most memorable section of the novel, "The Part About The Crimes." After reading this part, with it's gruesome descriptions of hundreds of murdered women and girls, you'll wish it had stayed in Detroit; but the truth is the Detroit part is quickly and easily forgotten.
You're giving lots of credit to in-flight magazines and what can be gleaned from them, I would know.
ReplyDelete~HATR.
"Dead or alive, you're coming with me."
ReplyDelete-- Robo Cop
"Robocop not only dramatizes the dehumanization of untrammeled technological development, it resists the postmodern fatalism of someone like Baudrillard who concludes that the Subject has lost its battle with the Object and so should surrender and embrace "fatal strategies." While Robocop depicts a cyberblitzed, post-catastrophic, hyperreal, technified world, it also suggests that technology cannot achieve its goal of a perfectly enclosed, self-referential entombment, that simulation strategies do not necessarily succeed, and that the human subject is not so easily erased. Robocop's struggle to understand what has happened to him and who he is, his identification with his former human self irrevocably entrapped within a steel body, his rebellion against bureaucracy and his corporate creators, and the forging of his own will against a technological determination, constitute this film's undeniably utopian moments. Robocop dramatizes the resilience of a subject, albeit a cyborg, amidst the most incredibly reified and subjugating conditions, and allegorizes its attempts to find meaning and value within a corrupt and decadent postmodern world."
set in detroit, it sounds like a freakin' novel to me.
--LtD
Is One More Spoke okay? Do we need to send out a search party? Are you snowbound? I have a shovel, we can organize a team to rescue you.
ReplyDelete~HATR.
should have painted him pink when you had the chance this summer. he would be easier now to locate in the snow. ;)
ReplyDelete-- LtD
OMS got enough pink paint on oneself without the need for assistance from any of us.
ReplyDelete~HATR.
"Yes, there are the crime novelists Elmore Leonard and Donald Goines, but when it comes to literary fiction Detroit's preeminent voice is nowhere to be found. "
ReplyDeleteElmore Leonard is a far better novelist than most "literary" types.
ps. Bolano never visited the US at all